![]() For all these type of users 4K is typically a hindrance rather than an advantage. For me this camera is aimed at run and gun users, people making content strictly for the web and event shooters. Many people were disappointed that the C100 Mark II couldn’t do 4K either internally or externally. There seems to be a misconception out on the blogosphere that it essential for any new camera to be able to shoot 4K. But to me none of this matters given how and what I would use the camera for. ![]() It doesn’t have high frame rates or 4K recording. So why do I like the C100 Mark II? There has been a lot of criticism online that the C100 Mark II was not a substantial upgrade over the original C100. I use Sony cameras most of the time and was not a fan of the Canon C300. ![]() If you are a regular follower of Newsshooter this might come as a bit of a surprise. I’ll come straight out and say it – I like the C100 Mark II.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |